AIRSPACE / INFRASTRUCTURE / ASSURANCE

The airspace above.
The systems below.

Counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) and operational technology (OT) security meet at the same critical sites. SSX360 connects field systems, infrastructure assessment, and the evidence needed to review the work.

Explore counter-UAS

QK-100 MORPHINE aircraft above the clouds — QK-100 “MORPHINE”IN FLIGHT TEST

01 / OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

Airspace and infrastructure at one site

Airspace activity, field communications, and control systems share an operating environment. Define the interfaces, authorization boundaries, and review questions together.

FIG. 01 / SHARED OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

02 / COUNTER-UAS

Evaluate the airspace.

QK-100 “MORPHINE” is in flight test and available for evaluation and demonstrations. An evaluation considers the aircraft, supporting sensors, field communications, and the records needed to assess the results.

QK-100 evaluation and demonstration
Named-site assessment scope
Communications and telemetry integrity
Defined evidence period

Explore QK-100 “MORPHINE”

03 / OPERATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

Examine the infrastructure.

Scoped security assessment of control systems, communications, and machine-authorization boundaries. Testing follows written authorization and agreed rules of engagement.

Authorized penetration testing
Communications and telemetry integrity
Machine-authorization review
Signed findings and evidence

Cybersecurity

04 / SHARED FOUNDATIONS

Systems supporting the site

N.3.X.U.S OS provides the software architecture for tactical edge cohesion. Explore the participating systems and their roles before defining an integration or evaluation.

Software coordination

N.3.X.U.S OS

Hardware interfaces, perception, application logic, field communications, and evidence requirements within one architecture.

Sensing

God-Knox

Photon-counting sensing with SPAD detection, TCSPC timing, and a reference channel.

Field communications

QFN

Field networking and timing context, with quantum research using a U.S.-based testbed.

Electronic warfare

JAM-RF

Directional RF counter-UAS module design with external cueing, hardware authorization, and signed event records.

Assessment and evidence

Accountable Evidence Plane

Scoped assessment, signed records, and offline verification for technical review.

05 / TECHNICAL ENGAGEMENT

A clear path to evaluation.

01
Share the requirement.
Identify the relevant capability, operating context, and decision your team needs to make.
02
Set the evaluation.
Confirm evaluation questions, authorization, deliverables, and information-exchange arrangements in writing.
03
Review the findings.
Review methods, observations, and limitations against the agreed evaluation questions.

Government & industry overview

The airspace above.The systems below.