Independent mission authorization

Autonomy earns authorization.

Weeping Angels by SSX360 converts fragmented security evidence into a decision an authorizing official can verify and defend. Authorize, continuously verify, and revoke consequential autonomous systems.

Signed decisions Vendor-neutral evidence Historical reconstruction
Vendor-neutral evidenceSigned decisions Continuous revocationOSCAL 1.2.2 Air-gapped capable
Why this exists now

The telemetry stack is crowded. The decision layer is missing.

AI runtime security, identity, cloud posture, GRC, red-team, and SIEM products already generate evidence. The hard question is narrower: can a risk owner defend why an autonomous system was allowed to act?

Buyer pressure
  • cATOContinuous authorization shifts the conversation from static paperwork to live evidence, monitoring, and risk determination.
  • FedRAMP 20xRecurring authorization reports make evidence deltas and accepted-risk history operationally important.
  • Agent identityNIST and NCCoE activity points toward stronger identity, authorization, and auditability expectations for software and AI agents.
SSX360 stance
  • PartnerConsume evidence from runtime security, identity, red-team, GRC, cloud, and SIEM systems.
  • DecideBind system identity, mission policy, evidence chain, and outcome into a signed authorization state.
  • ProveReconstruct why autonomy was granted or revoked without exposing proprietary scoring internals.
The missing decision layer

Security controls observe. We authorize.

Runtime security, identity, red teaming, and governance products each see part of the system. SSX360 turns their evidence into a mission-scoped authorization state with a defensible history.

01 / BIND

Bind the mission

Define the system, delegated authority, permitted capabilities, required controls, and operating conditions.

02 / VERIFY

Verify continuously

Normalize evidence across control vendors, test ranges, identities, configurations, and deployed behavior.

03 / DECIDE

Grant or revoke

Issue an independently verifiable decision bound to the exact system, policy, and evidence state.

Works above your controls

Keep the stack. Add a decision.

Weeping Angels is designed to complement runtime-security, identity, red-team, SIEM, and compliance platforms. No rip-and-replace. No new blind trust.

EVIDENCEYour control stackRuntime telemetry, identity, red-team results, configurations, and assessment artifacts.
->
ASSURANCEWeeping Angels / SSX360Mission policy, provenance, freshness, conflict resolution, and continuous evaluation.
->
DECISIONAuthorize or revokeA signed, reconstructable decision for operators, risk owners, and authorizing officials.
The operating principle
Autonomy should never inherit trust. It should earn authorization, continuously.
Built for interoperability

Evidence that survives the vendor.

The public verification model follows emerging federal and industry direction while the decision intelligence remains proprietary.

NIST AI AGENTSIdentity, delegation, authorization, auditing, and non-repudiation.
NIST AI 800-4Continuous monitoring across functionality, operations, security, compliance, and impact.
OSCAL 1.2.2Official-schema-validated assessment-results evidence export.
DSSE / SLSAPortable signed attestations bound to configuration, policy, and evidence.
What we publishVerification surface

Signed decisions, standards alignment, evidence interfaces, and reproducible grant/revoke workflows.

What we demonstratePilot evidence

Mission policy, connector behavior, revocation exercises, OSCAL exports, and historical reconstruction.

What stays privateDecision intelligence

Proprietary evaluation logic, customer-specific mappings, and sensitive mission calibration remain under NDA.

Design partner program

One mission. Ninety days. A defensible decision.

Bring one consequential autonomous workflow, a named risk owner, and the controls already deployed. We will establish the mission boundary, integrate the evidence, and demonstrate continuous authorization.

  • Independently verifiable grants and revocations
  • Detection of configuration and authorization drift
  • Historical reconstruction of every decision
  • Validated machine-readable assessment evidence
Build with us

Operators, engineers, and design partners wanted.

If you are working on consequential autonomy, runtime AI security, agent identity, cATO evidence, or defense deployment paths, send a short note. We care more about proof and urgency than polish.

Interested in applying